Home MLB Transfer and Trading deadlines

Transfer and Trading deadlines

by Matt Smith

Many football fans were repeatedly pressing their F5 key last night, hoping to find exciting news of rampant transfer rumours turning into actual transactions.  As long-touted deals were finally completed, as well as deals that seemed to come out of nowhere at the last moment, the transfer window shut at midnight with the promise of drama and excitement being completely fulfilled.  Somehow, the MLB trading deadline never seems to work out that way. 

We did at least have the Manny Ramirez trade to set the tongues wagging this year, but generally the deadline is an anti-climax.  Of course, in baseball there isn’t really a firm deadline: teams can still add players after 31 July if they pass through waivers.  That takes a bit of the drama away in comparison to the Premiership (Football League teams can continue to sign loan players from a week after the deadline has passed). 

Perhaps more importantly, baseball provides a trading deadline rather than a transfer deadline.  There’s still a certain amount of brinkmanship when finalizing a trade, but throwing large sums of cold hard cash into the equation makes things that much more complicated.  More deals may be left up in the air ahead of the deadline as a result.  Or perhaps it makes it simpler?  It seems that some teams can always find an extra million or so to complete a deal once the deadline is looming, whereas deciding to part with a higher quality prospect (or two) is a more difficult call to make. 

What’s more, footballers have a huge advantage over their baseball counterparts when it comes to player power.  Dimitar Berbatov wanted to join Man Utd and therefore he put Spurs into a position where they had little choice but to sell.  The same can be said for Robinho, although his grand plan came a little unstuck when he backed himself into a corner with Real Madrid and ended up basically having to accept a move to Man City (a team he probably had barely heard of prior to yesterday).  Yes, ballplayers can enjoy the benefits of free agency more readily, but they have to give up a lot of ground earlier in their careers to enjoy such a privilege.

So, there are several reasons why football’s transfer deadline can produce more action than MLB’s trading deadline.  This begs the question why the Premier League doesn’t follow MLB’s practice of putting the deadline at a more reasonable hour, rather than waiting until midnight?  MLB’s deadline this year was 04.00 pm eastern (01.00 pm pacific), meaning that any dramatic deals could be promoted to maximum effect.  How many people bothered to stay up until the small hours to see whether one already rich footballer had moved to a rich football club?  If memory serves me correctly, the football transfer deadline used to be set for 17.00, which from a publicity standpoint makes much more sense.  20.00 would probably be ideal, using the deadline as a big prime time TV event allowing even casual football fans to enjoy the action as it unfolds and giving reporters plenty of time to write comprehensive stories for the early editions of their newspapers the following morning.

Football could learn something from baseball here and, considering the growing American influence in the English game, maybe they will take it on board?   Or maybe football would be too proud for that?

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.