About the Post

Author Information

Matt Smith is the editor and lead writer at BaseballGB. An Oakland A's fan, Matt has been obsessed with baseball since 1998 and started writing about the sport in 2006.

Book Review: The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010

The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010 produced by Dave Studenmund (Acta Sports, 2009), 368 pages

The lack of actual games can make the baseball offseason seem a depressing period, but in some ways it makes for a nice breather after a long season.  Away from the unrelenting schedule, there’s more time to sit back and think about the sport, to ponder how the season played out, delve into the sport’s history and be fascinated by new research.  What’s more, the folks at the Hardball Times website conjure up an annual that allows you to do all of these things from the starting point of a single book.

Most baseball annuals seem to be largely focused on the fantasy baseball crowd these days.  That’s a big market to aim at, of course, but it doesn’t make for books that you are likely to come back to in future years.  The Hardball Times deals with this by issuing two books: a season preview for the fantasy crowd and an annual ‘review’ that has a longer-lasting appeal.  The annual follows a standard format every year: a review of every division, a commentary section based on the season just gone and other topics of interest, a history section, an analysis section full of research articles and a lengthy statistics section to round everything off. 

The Hardball Times website recently removed its stats section and now refers you on to the ever-expanding offerings of Fangraphs.com.  However, stats are still a very important part of HBT’s annual.  Just under half of the pages are dedicated to the Statistics section that looks back on the 2009 season (and there’s an important point to note: although it’s the 2010 annual, the stats relate to 2009).  The section starts with some cutting-edge fielding stats courtesy of John Dewan, whose Fielding Bible I and II books (the latter is on my ‘to review’ list) have done much to advance the analysis of fielding.  There is then a selection of charts and tables that look at team performances in both leagues before we get to the bulk of the numbers: batting, pitching and fielding stats for every team. 

The stats are put into context for every team section via an interesting chart that shows how their fortunes changed over the course of the season in a variety of ways (runs scored/allowed etc) and a ‘Stats Facts’ box picks out some of the key bits of information contained in the tables that follow.    All of the standard stats are included, which is always nice to have in a handy paperback reference, but the section’s main appeal is the unique content of so-called ‘batted ball stats’ that reveal a whole new perspective on a batter or pitcher’s profile. 

Like anything, they need some explanation for you to make real sense of them.  Some of these batted ball stats can now be found on the Fangraphs site (for example, Joe Mauer and Tim Lincecum), but the best place to appreciate them is in Dave Studeman’s (HBT’s Manager) weekly Batted Ball reports.  They were launched for the 2009 season as part of an excellent package that included the HBT annual, although unfortunately this deal was only available to people in North America.  People who buy the annual are able to download all of the reports from the season (as well as other spreadsheets) and they are a very enjoyable complement to the book.

The stats are great to flick through, but it is the articles that make the annual really stand out.  Written by a combination of HBT staff and guest contributions from some of the best baseball analysts around, they cover a range of subjects in a variety of styles, while always maintaining a high standard of quality. 

The articles focusing on recent events concentrate on the less-obvious targets, such as the 2009 World Baseball Classic, the problems faced in signing Latin American prospects and the business side to the sport.  In the History section, among other articles, former White Sox and Orioles manager Paul Richards is the subject of the annual’s regular ‘Manager in a box’ feature, Craig Brown provides an excellent summary of the inception of free agency and Chris Jaffe looks back at the 1972 World Series between the A’s and Reds, probing the possibility that it was the best series of all time while considering how we might define what ‘best’ means in this context. 

These articles would appeal to any baseball fan; however HBT has made its name by going deeper into topics and offering something to the baseball fan that wants to read about, and possibly be inspired to contribute to, the advanced statistical analysis of the game.  So there are various in-depth articles explaining and exploring new concepts such as Bill James’ ‘Strong Seasons leading Index’ (essentially a system designed to uncover which players are likely to match or improve their performance next season), Sky Andrecheck’s ‘Championship Leverage Index’ (a way to quantify the relative meaning/importance of each game in a season) and Jeff Sackmann’s new approach to producing ‘Major League Equivalents’ (“estimates of how a non-Major League player [in the Minors, Japan etc] would have performed in the Major Leagues in a given period of time”). 

Along with all the other analysis articles (such as two about the use of PITCHf/x data – the info that can be found in MLB.com’s Gameday application), they are clearly not aimed at a baseball newcomer.  It is challenging stuff at times, but challenging in a good way (stretching you, making you think etc) rather than a bad way (difficult to read and understand, although there are some technical passages that I freely admit to skipping over, such as Dave Allen’s explanation of how he creates his PITCHf/x graphs).   They hold your attention because the writers are not crunching numbers for the sake of it.  They are using statistical analysis and data to look at questions that will interest baseball fans of all categories.

The decline of pitchers going deeper into games and the changing usage patterns of relief aces are topics that many baseball fans will argue about, so Tom Tango and Sean Smith’s articles on these subjects should appeal to all.  Or what about the playing conditions at the two new stadiums in New York?  They were a big talking point during the 2009 season, so why wouldn’t you want to move beyond generic observations (Citi Field killed the Mets’ offense, New Yankee Stadium is a bandbox etc) and read what conclusions Greg Rybarczyk can draw from his Hit Tracker data (and very interesting conclusions they are too)?  It’s analysis of the best kind: focused on interesting topics, well-explained, thought-provoking without dogmatically stating that the findings are unquestionable facts.

While they should appeal to all, there’s no doubt that the analysis articles and the large stats section will be appreciated most by baseball fans who already take a keen interest in this side of the game.  This is not a ‘what happened in 2009’ type annual for baseball newcomers, but the Hardball Times Annual is an excellent concept for stat-minded fans and this 2010 edition matches the quality of previous efforts.

Have you read “The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010”? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments section below. Can you recommend any other similar books? If so, let us know.

Tags: , ,

10 Responses to “Book Review: The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010”

  1. Thanks for the review. Any thoughts on, overall, what the best annual is to get? While I’d like some stats stuff, I’d ideally like well-written articles too. I guess, whatever the equivilent to Wisden is. I’ve certainly had my eye on the Hardball Times annual for a little while, but are the Bill James or Ron Shandler books a better bet? Or something else perhaps?

    January 20, 2010 at 11:44 am Reply
  2. Matt Smith #

    Hi Steve. I can’t say I’ve found a great equivalent to Wisden. The HBT annual is probably the best from an articles point of view and there doesn’t seem to be a really strong ‘looking back at last season’ annual with lots of writing in it apart from that.

    Most of the others are much more dominated by stats, geared towards fantasy owners (as mentioned in the review). Titles by James and Shandler basically do a similar job, largely stat based with some writing, and I think buying one over the other normally comes down to personal preference of style.

    You then have titles like the Baseball Prospectus book (normally out at the end of February) which again is mainly a fantasy aid with team essays and a few additional analysis articles, although it does contain a good prospects section. I wasn’t quite so impressed by the 2009 effort, but hopefully they’ll be back on form this year.

    There are also several ‘preview mags’ that come out in February/March every year, again largely aimed at fantasy players. Athlon and Lindy’s and the Sporting News are the main ones to consider.

    January 20, 2010 at 7:25 pm Reply
  3. Matt Smith #

    My review of Baseball Prospectus 2009 (including a link to my review of the 2008 edition) can be found here:
    http://www.baseballgb.co.uk/?p=2315

    January 20, 2010 at 7:28 pm Reply
  4. Thanks Matt, that’s really, really helpful. I’ll probably pick up the TBT annual now, and then maybe a more fantasy-orientated publication later – I need all the help I can get!

    January 21, 2010 at 10:57 am Reply
  5. Delziel #

    Interesting the Wisden idea – maybe there is a gap in the market?

    The closest I can recall to something along those lines is Baseball Digest magazine (which I used to pick up at Sportspages on Charing X Road), that had some great articles – not really sabermetrics (sometimes saber-heavy essays can be a little dry). Not sure how available it is now? Although there is the website.

    I previously have read Baseball Prospectus (last 2 yrs) and like you Matt, found the lack of index annoying.
    I think based on your review I may give THT a try (seeing it’s out now), as you say it’s a long off season sometimes and a little review/preview goes a long way to get excited about ST and the full season.

    I’ll probably pick up BP for fantasy in Feb – but that kind of depends on how THT pans out.

    Thanks for review Matt – definite food for thought.

    January 26, 2010 at 6:47 pm Reply
  6. Matt Smith #

    No problem. There are normally a few British-based websites that sell the baseball mags prior to the season. They can cost a few quid (£6-£7 sometimes), but it’s nice to have something like that to flick through and carry about in your bag as the season is about to begin.

    January 26, 2010 at 8:37 pm Reply
  7. Got this in the post today, and looks really good from a quick glance – a real nice balance between articles and stats. So, thanks for the review – it certainly pushed me into making this investment!

    February 5, 2010 at 4:28 pm Reply
  8. Matt Smith #

    Good stuff. Hope you enjoy it.

    February 6, 2010 at 4:06 pm Reply

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. * Review: The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010 « Ron Kaplan’s Baseball Bookshelf - January 21, 2010

    [...] * Review: The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2010 20 01 2010 From the Baseball GB site, this review. [...]

  2. BaseballGB » Book Review: Baseball Prospectus 2010 - March 6, 2010

    [...] That’s not a big blow for me because the articles in the 2009 edition were uninspiring and the Hardball Times Annual is the book to buy if you are looking for that sort of content in any [...]

Leave a Reply